Website Updating - Minor Interruptions Expected

Sign In |
Back to Blog

FXCubic vs Centroid Bridge : Which One Can Scale With Your Brokerage?

Broker Operations

September 14, 2025

6 min read

218 views

FXCubic vs Centroid Bridge : Which One Can Scale With Your Brokerage?

Brokers rely on bridges to manage liquidity, risk, and execution. This in-depth comparison of FXCubic vs Centroid Bridge explores which solution truly scales with growing brokerages.

Running a successful brokerage is as much about technology infrastructure as it is about client acquisition or regulatory licensing. At the center of this infrastructure lies the bridge, the software that connects your trading platform (MT4, MT5, or multi-asset terminals) to liquidity providers, manages execution, and handles risk.

In today’s highly competitive market, two names often come up when discussing bridge solutions: FXCubic and Centroid Bridge. Both offer powerful capabilities, but their strengths, depth, and long-term scalability are not the same.

This article provides a detailed comparison between FXCubic and Centroid Bridge, exploring technology, liquidity aggregation, risk management, analytics, company background, and support to determine which one can truly scale with your brokerage.


1. Why the Bridge Matters in Brokerage Growth

Before diving into FXCubic vs Centroid, it’s important to understand the bridge’s role in a brokerage:

  • Liquidity Aggregation: Consolidates quotes and order flow from multiple liquidity providers to ensure competitive spreads and deep execution.

  • Order Routing: Directs orders intelligently (smart order routing) to minimize slippage and maximize execution quality.

  • Risk Management: Balances A-book and B-book flow, monitors exposure, and automates hedging.

  • Analytics: Provides brokers with actionable insights on trade flow, client behavior, and profitability.

  • Scalability: Ensures the system can handle higher order volumes as the broker expands.

The bridge is essentially the “engine room” of a brokerage. If it fails to scale, performance issues quickly become visible to traders, slippage, requotes, outages—and client trust erodes.


2. FXCubic: Overview

Founded: 2017

Headquarters: London, UK

FXCubic is positioned as a liquidity engine and bridge provider for brokers, especially those running MT4 and MT5 environments. Its main focus areas are:

  • Price Aggregation: FXCubic connects brokers with multiple liquidity providers, offering parallel connections to help improve execution.

  • Real-Time Markup API: A key feature allowing brokers to adjust spreads and markups dynamically based on market conditions or strategy.

  • Performance: The company emphasizes its ability to handle thousands of trades per second, making it suitable for high-frequency trading on MT4/MT5.

  • Deployment Model: FXCubic often highlights the independence of its infrastructure, brokers can host their own bridge instances, giving them sovereignty over data and operations.

FXCubic has made strides in attracting mid-sized brokers and has a handful of public references, such as Libertex, a well-known broker that has adopted its technology.


3. Centroid Bridge: Overview

Founded: 2016

Headquarters: Dubai, UAE

Centroid Bridge is part of Centroid Solutions, a fintech company known for multi-asset risk management, connectivity, and hosting solutions. Centroid positions itself not just as a bridge provider, but as a full enterprise-grade infrastructure partner.

Its strengths include:

  • Connectivity Scale: Supports more than 10 platform types and over 250 liquidity sources, making it highly adaptable for brokers with diverse needs.

  • Smart Order Routing (SOR): Sophisticated aggregation and routing logic to reduce slippage and optimize execution across venues.

  • Dynamic Risk Management: Centroid is widely recognized for its risk intelligence, tools that allow hybrid A/B book setups, exposure monitoring, and real-time hedging automation.

  • Enterprise Hosting: Offers 24/7 emergency hosting support, ensuring stability during peak market events.

  • Analytics: Provides real-time dashboards for trade flow, profitability, and client activity analysis.

Centroid’s client base includes enterprise-level brokers and liquidity providers, particularly in the Middle East, Europe, and Asia.


4. Technology & Architecture

FXCubic

  • Strong MT4/MT5-focused architecture.

  • Provides parallel connections to LPs, reducing bottlenecks.

  • Emphasis on throughput (“thousands of trades/sec”).

Centroid

  • Designed for multi-asset, multi-platform environments.

  • Low-latency infrastructure with institutional-grade architecture.

  • Handles heavy order flow without compromising stability.

Verdict: FXCubic is solid for MT4/MT5 retail brokers, but Centroid’s architecture is more future-proof, supporting multi-asset growth.


5. Liquidity Aggregation & Execution

FXCubic

  • Good at consolidating liquidity across multiple providers.

  • Offers a markup API for real-time spread adjustments.

  • Execution quality relies heavily on MT4/MT5 environments.

Centroid

  • Advanced liquidity aggregation with smart order routing.

  • Customizable routing rules for each broker’s execution strategy.

  • Designed to minimize slippage and maximize execution quality across assets.

Verdict: FXCubic offers clever pricing tools, but Centroid provides more precise execution controls and scalability for brokers expanding into multi-asset markets.


6. Risk Management

FXCubic

  • Provides basic risk controls to protect brokers from toxic flow.

  • Supports standard A/B book setups.

Centroid

  • Dynamic risk management at the core.

  • Hybrid A/B book models, exposure monitoring, and real-time hedging.

  • Ability to make rule-based changes on the fly without restarting systems.

Verdict: Centroid is far stronger in risk tooling, enabling brokers to optimize revenue and manage exposure proactively.


7. Analytics & Reporting

FXCubic

  • Includes trade monitoring and some historical analytics.

  • Focused on LP price comparisons and execution stats.

Centroid

  • Real-time dashboards for profitability, exposure, and client behavior.

  • Enterprise-style reporting for decision-making.

Verdict: Centroid wins with richer analytics and intelligence tools.


8. Performance & Reliability

FXCubic

  • Strong throughput for MT4/MT5 environments.

  • Brokers maintain private instances, which gives them independence but requires their own infrastructure investment.

Centroid

  • Proven stability at scale, even under volatile market conditions.

  • 24/7 hosting support ensures uptime during critical events.

Verdict: FXCubic is reliable for smaller setups, but Centroid is more battle-tested for enterprise volumes.


9. Integration & Compatibility

FXCubic

  • Primarily geared toward MT4/MT5 integration.

  • Offers API connectivity but within a narrower ecosystem.

Centroid

  • Integrates with MT4, MT5, FIX API, and a wide range of third-party platforms.

  • Suitable for multi-platform brokers running different trading systems.

Verdict: Centroid’s broader compatibility makes it the better choice for brokers planning to diversify platforms.


10. Support & Company Strength

FXCubic

  • Offers support via helpdesk, email, and phone.

  • Hours and SLA structure are less transparent.

  • Growing company, but still building visibility in the industry.

Centroid

  • Dubai-based fintech with strong MENA and global presence.

  • 24/7 emergency hosting support published and transparent.

  • Well-established reputation among enterprise-grade brokers.

Verdict: Centroid offers more robust and transparent support, with proven presence among top-tier brokers.


11. Which One Scales Better With Your Brokerage?

Scaling a brokerage means handling:

  • More clients without execution delays.

  • More platforms as you expand beyond MT4/MT5.

  • More liquidity providers for deeper markets.

  • More risk variables with larger exposure.

While FXCubic is a capable solution, especially for mid-tier, MT4/MT5-only brokers looking for cost-effective bridging its scope is narrower.

Centroid Bridge, on the other hand, is designed for enterprise-grade scaling. With multi-asset connectivity, advanced risk management, smart order routing, and 24/7 support, it enables brokers to expand confidently into new markets and higher volumes without re-architecting their infrastructure.


12. Final Verdict

  • FXCubic: Best suited for smaller to mid-size brokers running primarily on MT4/MT5, needing straightforward aggregation and flexible pricing tools.

  • Centroid Bridge: The clear choice for scaling brokers, offering institutional-grade risk tools, multi-asset connectivity, enterprise hosting, and proven global presence.

If your brokerage’s goal is long-term growth and institutional credibility, Centroid Bridge is the winner.


13. Brokeret’s Perspective

At Brokeret, we work closely with brokers to evaluate, implement, and optimize bridge solutions. As an official Centroid Bridge partner, we’ve seen firsthand how it helps brokers scale smoothly and sustainably.

Learn more about our Centroid Bridge Management services and how we help brokerages grow with the right technology foundation.

Share: